Print
Email
Share

18% tax on soda equals 5 pounds weight loss, study finds

18% tax on soda equals 5 pounds weight loss, study finds

Credit: AP

18% tax on soda equals 5 pounds weight loss, study finds

by KING5.com

NWCN.com

Posted on March 9, 2010 at 11:15 AM

Updated Tuesday, Mar 9 at 11:16 AM

SEATTLE – As the Washington state Legislature mulls over whether to raise taxes on cigarettes, candy and bottled water, a new study suggests that people would lose five pounds a year if soda prices were hiked up 18 percent.

Nutrition researchers at the University of North Carolina, studied the eating habits of 5,115 adults between the ages of 18 and 30 over a 20 year period. The study looked at consumption of soda, pizza, hamburgers and whole milk.

Researchers found that a 10 percent price hike led to a 7 percent decrease in soda consumption and an 11.5 percent decrease in pizza consumption. More specifically when it came to soda, researchers reportedly found that a $1 increase in the price of soda resulted in an intake of 124 fewer calories per day. As a result, there was weight loss.

From that, the researchers suggest that an 18 percent tax on the price of soda would cause a person to consume about 56 fewer calories per day and lose about five pounds in a year. They say that could lead to fewer cases of diabetes, heart disease and cancer.

The study reportedly found that, on average, participants started the project consuming 2,972 calories per day and lowered that to 2,403 calories per day. While that sounds impressive, it also contradicts a study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released in 2004 that showed American women increased their daily calorie intake by 22 percent between 1971 and 2000, and men increased their daily calorie consumption by 7 percent over that same period.

The beverage industry disagrees with the North Carolina study's findings. A spokesperson for the American Beverage Association tells USA Today that the study "is not representative of real world eating habits, It picks and chooses what foods to look at with narrow presumptions about how foods might be substituted for one another."

The study was published Monday in the Archives of Internal Medicine.

Print
Email
Share

Forgot Password?

Don't have an account?

Register Now

Member Benefits

Link your account to your Twitter or Facebook account for easier login!

Link your account to your Facebook profile Link your account to your Twitter profile

Check box to receive Free Special Offers

* - Indicates required field

Check box to receive Free Special Offers

Connecting to

You may need to allow pop up window for this step of registration

Just one more step:

Please take a moment to review the available e-mail newsletters has to offer. Place a checkbox next to the newsletters you wish to subscribe to.

Welcome.

Thank you for becoming a member of NWCN.com. You now have full access to the best local coverage and late breaking news from NWCN.com. Soon you will be redirected to the page you were seeking, and a confirmation email will be delivered to you.

You will need to respond to the confirmation e-mail for your account to be activated.

NWCN.com is dedicated to bringing you exceptional news and outstanding information services, all while personalizing it to your liking. We're sure you'll enjoy being a NWCN.com member! If you need assistance, please contact us.